I found this article Is Pinterest a Haven for Copyright Violations? written by
someone called Greekgeek, on a web site called HubPages. This article talks
about how when someone “pins” a photo or piece of artwork, it could possibly be
a copyright infringement. Described in this article, “Copyright is the legal
right of artists, authors, and photographers to decide how their own work
is copied. (They may sell this right, and thus profit from their work.).”
So just supplying a link to the photo, or artwork is not good enough. In this article,
it also gives a link to a story where a company got sued for using a
copyrighted photo on their web site and even took it down after they were asked
to do so, but still had to pay for their mistake.
Also discussed is Pinterest’s stand
on copyrighted images and how non of the members are supposed to pin or post
anything that is copyrighted unless you actually have the owner of the
copyright’s permission. Google Image Search is compared to Pinterest. The
conclusion was the Google does not save its images, it merely pulls it from
other websites, and if a photo is removed from a certain website then Google
does not pull it back up again. As compared to where on Pinterest the image
stays on the website.
When posting/pinning to Pinterest you give Pinterest
permission to “distribute, sublicense, and sell that content”
(Greekgeek).
After reading this is has
definitely opened my eye as to what I will be pinning, repining and/or posting
onto my Pinterest page. I know a lot of people who have crafting blogs and they
want you to pin their stuff so they can get more recognition. So by them saying
please feel free to pin things you see, or please pin this if you like it, or
something similar to this on their blog page that is giving me permission to
post their work.
This article does give Pinterest
credit to being a fun website, and assumes that most of its users are not
purposely breaking the copyright laws. There is also a link provided in this
article on how to use Pinterest legally. At the end of this article there is a
side note type of article that gives actual copyright abuse examples. In this
article by Amy Locurto, she reports on “photos pinned without credit
or link -- and this wasn't the rare exception. One correspondent found that of
100 copies of her photo posted on Pinterest, "maybe 5 were credited.”
It is understandable how a simple
pin can lead to many more pins and infringing on the copyright law very easily,
if the wrong photo or artwork is pinned. I will definitely pay better attention
to the things I pin from here on out.
Jenelle Schiermeister :)
Wow, to be honest, I never thought about what pinning a pic or repinning one that is already used, could mean about those copyright violations. As we read in Chapter 13, I just assumed that if something was pinned it gave access to be viewed and repinned. People could take pictures of anything and anywhere and repin them. How could Pinterest even monitor that? I love the site myself, but never thought of how others could perceive it as copyright infrigement.
ReplyDeleteGood reporting!!!!
I find it interesting the lengths that people will go to violate one's privacy or get there paws on your information. It makes me wonder if all this internet stuff is really a good thing or just a way for the Gov't and others to keep an eye on us. No, I am not paranoid and I will use it still; but it does make me think.
ReplyDeleteTracie